Firefox HTML Rendering

[Conrad Knauer]

On 2/15/07, Joel Bryan Juliano <joelbryan.juliano at gmail.com> wrote:

> > > If only Firefox would be as high quality as Epiphany, then I'm not
> > > going to use Epiphany.
> > > The problem is everything is linked up and compiled with Firefox like
> > > an adware in Ubuntu,
> > > but all the devs know that it's possible to progress with this
> > > unpliant approach right from the start.
> > > There are xulrunner, which the Debian mainstream have already been
> > > compiled in and been using in their
> > > GNOME desktop without the adware.
> >
> > What do you mean by firefox in ubuntu is an adware?  Do you feel their
> > is too much Ubuntu branding
>
> If a user want only to have Epiphany as his browser, he can't, he'll have to live the fact that
> Firefox cannot be removed in his computer in Ubuntu, or else, everything will break.

That is not actually true; you can still have a working system without
Firefox, though there will be a couple holes here and there.  I think
what you're really complaining about is that you can't have Epiphany
without Firefox.  But that's no excuse for calling it "adware".

CK