Firefox HTML Rendering

[David Farning]

On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 10:28 +0800, Joel Bryan Juliano wrote:

> If only Firefox would be as high quality as Epiphany, then I'm not
> going to use Epiphany. 
> The problem is everything is linked up and compiled with Firefox like
> an adware in Ubuntu, 
> but all the devs know that it's possible to progress with this
> unpliant approach right from the start.
> There are xulrunner, which the Debian mainstream have already been
> compiled in and been using in their
> GNOME desktop without the adware. 
> 

What do you mean by firefox in ubuntu is an adware?  Do you feel their
is too much Ubuntu branding

> I think people should think more about typesetting, rendering, and
> quality of the documents they worked on rather than the popularity of
> the application they use, I believe FOSS exists not just to provide an
> alternative, but a high quality alternative application that can do
> their jobs without loosing the quality of their work. 
> 
Since you are concerned about the quality of firefox, please consider
joining us on the ubuntu-mozillateam.  We are currently looking for
triagers, wiki maintainers, and devs.

thanks

-- 
David Farning <dfarning at gmail.com>