Edgy in the news
news at pointerstop.ca
Tue Oct 31 18:19:04 GMT 2006
Jonathan Jesse wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 04:51:35PM +0000, Matthew East wrote:
>>> * Daniel Robitaille:
>>> > The negative stories and blogs about Edgy are
>>> > starting to pile up:
>>> As with the last release cycle, people *expect* "apt-get dist-upgrade"
>>> to work, and are losing their systems when they try. The negative
>>> implications of not supporting upgrades via apt-get are starting to hit
>>> Ubuntu really hard in terms of reputation.
>> apt-get cannot and will not handle all upgrade scenarios; there's no way
>> around that.
>> How do you think we can better message the need to use the upgrade tool?
>> Perhaps dist-upgrade should warn the user that it is likely to cause
>> problems if they're using it for inter-release upgrades.
> Is apt-get dist-upgrade the recommend way to upgrade for Kubuntu then?
Obviously it can't be (if you have to use upgrade-manager for gnome).
> should you use adept to manage the repositories, switch them to Edgy and
> the do a Full Upgrade?
> Shouldn't we have an upgrade manager for kubuntu then?
Equally obviously, we should. However, what does an upgrade manager
actually have to do with the desktop? There shouldn't be This is just a
really ugly kludge. I've yet to see an example where dist-upgrade doesn't
work unless packages are broken - though I do realize there are situations
where dist-upgrade needs to be run more than once. The -desktop
requirement is just another kludge.
More information about the sounder