DMA
Alan McKinnon
alan at linuxholdings.co.za
Wed May 24 02:23:24 BST 2006
On Tuesday 23 May 2006 16:51, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:34:02AM +1000, Alexander Jacob Tsykin
said:
> > Ubuntu has progressed a lot in terms of ease of use, but it is
> > not there yet. There is still a long way to go before it can even
> > begin to compare to the ease of installation that Microsoft
> > features.
>
> I just recently installed a second monitor, and this is one of the
> best examples I've found yet.
To be fair, the possibilities with two monitors on X11 are several. Do
you want:
1. Two displays with one screen each?
2. One display with two screens?
3. One big desktop that spans two monitors?
4. If resolutions differ, what to do with dead space?
5. Dual-head card, or two cards?
6. Different virtual desktops on each monitor?
7. If you have one big desktop, should the panel stretch across both,
or be constrained to one monitor? If so, which one?
8. Should centered dialogs appear in the middle of a double-sized
desktop, or centered on one monitor?
Suddenly, a config utility goes from apparently easy to mind-numbingly
complex - probably the underlying reason it hasn't really been done.
The problem gets even worse when the machine is a notebook and the
second monitor may or may not be connected when X starts.
> On Ubuntu, to enable Xinerama, I have to edit a configuration file
> by hand, adding lots of stuff to it. I have to bounce gdm manually
> each time, or reboot. If I'm lucky it will work. I didn't have
> enough time yesterday to futz with it, so it doesn't work yet, so
> although I'm confident it will, I can't state unequivocally that it
> does. The documentation is practically non-existent, and as I
> always do with Ubuntu, I used Google to find it because the search
> tools on the Ubuntu website are useless.
I share your pain - been there done that
> On Windows, I right-clicked the desktop, selected the "Settings"
> tab, and clicked a clearly-labelled box.
The down side is that of the many possibilities you might want, MS (or
the driver vendor) sees fit to let you use only one. In Linux, I can
start one X server on the primary monitor running KDE and a second X
server on the secondary monitor running e17. This lets me go wild
with e (still cranky & unstable at the best of times) while keeping
important apps (browser, mail, etc) open and unaffected when e needs
to be bounced. Try that on Windows.
So this is an unusual config, but the point is that I CAN do it. My OS
vendor doesn't make it easy, but they also don't rob me of the full
potential of the hardware. The trade-off is having to deal with
xorg.conf....
I don't see this changing soon, given xorg's architecture. If it ever
becomes fully modularized where drivers can be plugged in and out at
runtime like the kernel, then easy config tools will be a reality.
Maybe v7.x will do this, maybe not.
--
If only me, you and dead people understand hex,
how many people understand hex?
Alan McKinnon
alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za
+27 82, double three seven, one nine three five
More information about the sounder
mailing list