Working together on documentation (was Re: Quality Control Suggestion)

[Dennis Kaarsemaker]

On ma, 2006-05-08 at 19:03 +0100, Matthew East wrote:

> Glad you like it: has anyone who is involved with irc support got any
> views on this idea?

I like it very much.

> If a new question comes up for which there is no existing authoritative
> documentation, I think whoever comes across it should post to the -doc
> mailing list, and the answer can then be put into our work in progress
> documentation. If there is any doubt about the answer, we can ping an
> appropriate developer over irc or email.

Currently the bot is quite limited in functionality that would help
this, but I am already thinking about specifications for improvements
and will take this into account.

-- 
Dennis K.

Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/attachments/20060508/29ea107a/attachment.pgp