dapper+1 name, the Edgy...

[Dennis Kaarsemaker]

On wo, 2006-03-15 at 09:22 +0000, Matthew East wrote:

> 11:07 jdub | sabdfl: furthermore, i don't think this slip should
> impact
> dapper+1. ;-) [ultimately, i think this is an exception that can prove
> our rule, and can be messaged positively.]
> 
> 11:08 sabdfl | jdub: am willing to consider making dapper+1 a
> super-short cycle, would be.... edgy :-)
> 
> That makes it more than a rumour, I think :) 

Judging by history, around now the name of dapper+1 should be announced.
Or will this also have a 6-week delay? ;)
-- 
Dennis K.
 - Linux for human beings - http://www.ubuntu.com
 - Linux voor normale mensen - http://www.ubuntu-nl.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/attachments/20060315/39f88697/attachment.pgp