GPL compliance

Scott James Remnant scott at
Thu Jun 29 20:04:40 BST 2006

On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 14:28 -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:

> Fair enough. But it seems like it would probably make more sense for
> you use to the LGPL in the future where the issue is not up for
> debate.
The LGPL does not permit a library to be turned into an application.

Scott James Remnant
scott at
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :

More information about the sounder mailing list