qgil at desdeamericaconamor.org
Wed Jun 14 09:32:19 BST 2006
I've got in the mid of an ethical debate about the Ubuntu default
installation, and perhaps you can provide some more info.
The debate where I com from is focusing in the non-free packages
installed by default, with apparently no choice for the user (?) and no
info provided (??).
There is this example of a Ubuntu Dapper default install:
xxxxx at zzzzz:~$ vrms
Non-free packages installed on zzzzz
linux-386 Complete Linux kernel on 386.
linux-restricted-modules- Non-free Linux 2.6.15 modules on 386
linux-restricted-modules- Restricted Linux modules on 386.
linux-restricted-modules- Non-free Linux 2.6.15 modules helper
ttf-gentium Gentium TrueType font
5 non-free packages, 0.5% of 1068 installed packages.
The Gentium TrueType font is like free as for today by FSF standards, no
problem. About the rest:
- Are these modules installed always, or just depending on the devices
found by the installer?
- Is the user receiving any kind of information about these non-free
packages being used during the installation process?
- Is it a way for the user tu avoid in any way the installation of these
packages, either through a pre-install menu or any kind of optional
configuration during the installation process?
- The user of this example had apparently a 100% Debian system working
on the same hardware. Would this mean that he can *probably* (I'm not
asking "surely") remove the non-free kernel packages without damaging
I know about the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Ubuntu-libre plans, I just want
to know these details about the current Dapper behaviour. Thank you.
Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org | http://guadec.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aix=F2?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_=E9s?= una part
d'un missatge, signada digitalment
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/attachments/20060614/6c81aae0/attachment.pgp
More information about the sounder