A Continuing Look at Windows v. Linux Security

Tue Sep 27 04:57:31 CDT 2005

On di, 2005-09-27 at 02:27 -0700, Paul Harper wrote:
> http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2005-09-26-019-26-OP-DT-MS
> 
> "You will never be 100% "secure" because the upper
> limit is bound by human stupidity."
> 
> "Some Linux distributions have default configurations
> with apps running and listening on open ports, so this
> isn't just Microsoft. That is one of the reasons I
> like Debian and Ubuntu. Ubuntu has nothing open and I
> can build Debian servers from a minimal installation
> without any additional services running." 

Can't help it, but: AOl AOL!
I so agree with these statements :)
-- 
Dennis K.
  - Linux for human beings: http://www.ubuntulinux.org
  - Linux voor normale mensen: http://www.ubuntulinux.nl
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/attachments/20050927/a6b4404f/attachment-0001.pgp