RFC: include empty folder boot/uboot also for i386 and amd64 in os build

[Jian LUO]

Hi Oli,

Bug fired with suggestions and my workaround.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools-ubuntu-core/+bug/1563737

Cheers,
Jian
On Mar 29, 2016 17:16, "Oliver Grawert" <ogra at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> hi,
> Am Dienstag, den 29.03.2016, 16:17 +0200 schrieb Jian LUO:
> > Hi Sergio,
> >
> > Have you got time to look at the problem?
> >
> > Further more, the ubuntu-core-generic-initrd can't detect U-Boot on
> > x86 thus doesn't generate the correct fstab entry accordingly. I can
> > workaround the two issues with manually partitioning the SD image and
> > patch scripts/ubuntu-core-rootfs in my kernel snap. It would be great
> > however if Ubuntu core supports it officially.
> >
> there are sadly more issues than the one with the initrd [1], but it
> would be nice if you could file a bug against the
> initramfs-tools-ubuntu-core package where this binary comes from (this
> is also not limited to the generic initrd but will affect all initrds)
>
> there are also further issues with the "snappy list" command that has
> certain expectations about where a bootloader should mount stuff
> in /boot, i fear just hacking the initrd script wont help here.
>
> it would be good to get these issues fixed for the 16.04 snappy
> release :)
>
> ciao
>         oli
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/snappy/+bug/1563358
>
>
> --
> snappy-devel mailing list
> snappy-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/attachments/20160330/2db45e09/attachment-0001.html>