Application cwd in SNAP_APP_PATH vs SNAP_APP_DATA_PATH
Kyle Fazzari
kyle.fazzari at canonical.com
Thu Mar 17 22:17:07 UTC 2016
On 03/17/2016 06:06 PM, Sergio Schvezov wrote:
>
>
> El 04/03/16 a las 13:03, Gustavo Niemeyer escribió:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Didier Roche <didrocks at ubuntu.com
>> <mailto:didrocks at ubuntu.com>> wrote:
>>
>> So, they will probably either use:
>> $SNAP/<path_to_asset_or_helper>
>>
>>
>> To be fair, that argument goes both ways. They might just as well do
>> $SNAP_DATA/<path to data>.
>
> I am very late to this thread, but it seems all apps default to SNAP_DATA?
>
> ubuntu at localhost:~$ hello-world.env | grep '^PWD='
> PWD=/var/lib/snaps/hello-world.canonical/6.0
>
> Why not SNAP_USER_DATA? As a user I cannot do anything on SNAP_DATA
> unless I sudo, if that were the case I'd prefer the current PWD to be
> preserved so at least I know where I am.
+1 for PWD for binaries, SNAP_DATA for services.
--
Kyle Fazzari (kyrofa)
Software Engineer
Canonical Ltd.
kyle at canonical.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/attachments/20160317/32b1e4f6/attachment.pgp>
More information about the snappy-devel
mailing list