Should we hide the sideloaded versions? (Was: Re: Kernel snap debug advice)
Leo Arias
leo.arias at canonical.com
Wed Nov 18 18:59:33 UTC 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-11-16 12:43, Tim Gardner wrote:
> (amd64)ubuntu at localhost:~$ sudo snappy install
> --allow-unauthenticated kernel-generic-amd64_1_amd64.snap
> Installing kernel-generic-amd64_1_amd64.snap 2015/11/16
> 18:34:22.280402 verify.go:85: Signature check failed, but
> installing anyway as requested Name Date
> Version Developer ubuntu-core 2015-11-13 10
> ubuntu kernel-generic-amd64 2015-11-16 IFbCOQDeRJfW sideload webdm
> 2015-11-13 0.9.4 canonical generic-amd64 2015-11-13
> 1.4 canonical
>
> What is up with the kernel-generic-amd64 version ?
When you install a snap that doesn't come from the store, a random
version is assigned to it.
This value is confusing, and not really useful. Should we just stop
showing it? Something like "-" would be slightly better than
"IFbCOQDeRJfW".
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWTMqUAAoJEIUvYw0No8DgkT8P/j5yUYqsFyMyc+yvmLqptd2W
vIs7Ze/WPDYx/4XA2t/bdgEHPNTH/PXXDw7ffD8AA30NQlt2lXwMgIEMER7mZMJ/
Uv4cdZ4bKbABSa6MUE1b2UQFFje7DQjOW5X6eEJsOEUfAHcWM1iW9+nIW7uzAIG1
ItQzf5CRqrxdbuP7IoIblAXlQ8ZVlU65J8Ymo2EgjhOnVZvWXV0kzKa4n1uocJos
9jET6AHzgOv3SBqlRTxc83Wi6MPoxGq0iJuWAiX1j1FwbsY/k64v83sa3M1MJyCg
a5cCW8zUePgK+9M0CPmZKi9bw0vAT48E2xO/GmmArgjQnNt0oNbAUCkTxDgKZ0JF
+l1o6ftsTbjuezhL4ktrCCrbji0f8B93ippTzl03N470a6QLtUSvaT+5k9vfs/vZ
R2cbiBPVYlkjTHKmDwUTMeiHwFmXcWL9jOjjEq8Yfmrv9tILdmF5eAzBcnUIrZG5
zEYnhthOBDHz8MJ3XvkG+NPExz3qPqCrZnKnPdyYIIPmY7HZNRppnTLNd5MGPiSS
tUXHNjLzU/j82HZ0PJavcpqBh3AkhgulsWfkwgso3+qIiHwPYrEZqQbHeIzZRHbs
/YzCJuHKPCoGG54YNvkjpgosp+ynRw+bqTqYNsAzjwap+r1Wm3q08pj0dqo4yg3k
uFhf/yJIgM42vAlZlFmS
=4imG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the snappy-devel
mailing list