[RFC] Snappy frameworks
Michael Terry
michael.terry at canonical.com
Mon Mar 30 20:14:29 UTC 2015
Small typo:
"For frameworks, meta/packaging.yaml should contain something like:"
Should say "package.yaml"
-mt
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Jamie Strandboge <jamie at canonical.com>
wrote:
>
> We've discussed frameworks quite a bit but we've yet to provide a
> definition,
> how they will be used on snappy, how they work with the store and how
> they extend security policy. This email attempts to address this (I expect
> there
> to be some fine-tuning but I think it is in good enough shape for wider
> comment).
>
> Please see:
>
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jdstrand/snappy/snappy.frameworks-definition/view/head:/docs/frameworks.md
>
> Note 1: don't worry too much about the open questions at the end unless
> you feel
> they radically contradict the main part of the RFC. We can discuss those
> at a
> later date
>
> Note 2: some people may have heard about 'Frameworks for developers'. The
> above
> does not address this specifically (but is compatible with it) and
> discussions
> on this topic will happen elsewhere.
>
> --
> Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
>
>
>
> --
> snappy-devel mailing list
> snappy-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel
>
>
--
-mt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/attachments/20150330/fd521c87/attachment.html>
More information about the snappy-devel
mailing list