Request For Comment on ports change to package.yaml

[Wes Mason]

On 2 February 2015 at 19:52, Martin Albisetti <
martin.albisetti at canonical.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Sergio Schvezov
> <sergio.schvezov at canonical.com> wrote:
> > I wrote this proposal:
> > https://gist.github.com/sergiusens/97e9ea2e31d5f0fcc09a for dealing with
> > ports.
> >
> > Already discussed with a few folk before shooting it into the wild, and
> now
> > here it is. I'd appreciate some yea (+1) or nay's (-1).
> >
> > Feel free to comment against the gist, create PRs or just reply to this
> > email.
>
> Looks good and easy to understand.
> My only question is, how do you deal with multiple ports, or ranges of
> ports?
>
>
> --
> Martin


I created a fork of the gist with a few small improvements for formatting
(fixed spec link markdown error and using GitHub Flavoured Markdown for
syntax highlight of YAML blocks), and added an extra section proposing
commas and dashes for indicating multiple ports and ranges:
https://gist.github.com/1stvamp/e6e15767fb5af7eb6118
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/attachments/20150202/6210d0da/attachment.html>