Self-hosting snappy apps

[Jochen Breuer (dajool)]

On 14. Dezember 2014 13:13:15 MEZ, Martin Albisetti <martin.albisetti at canonical.com> wrote:
>We are working on making the development story a smooth and comfortable
>one.
>Current plan is to support adding your developer private gpg key to
>the Snappy image on boot, so you can push self-signed packages in
>whatever way you'd like to the image (snappy-remote, your own scripts,
>etc).
>
>If someone would like to do this on a commercial basis, we will
>sometime next year support Canonical-hosted private stores as well.

Just to be sure. With snappy it won't be possible to host an additional snappy repository myself, just like in the old apt days?

I do understand that the introduction of a config parameter like this would possibly compromise the reliability of the system. But there a some companies out there, that would have a huge problem with a repository that is not located within their IT. Would the only possible workaround be the direct distribution via SSH?
Jochen