Status of snapd on Arch Linux

Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakeling at
Mon Mar 20 22:41:27 UTC 2017

On 20/03/17 23:14, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> Most likely the snap was partly configured to run elsewhere, but not
> entirely.
> We really need to have someone looking into this package, preferably just
> restoring the standard /snap path.
> Can you rebuild the package and try that out?  Would be a nice data point.
> If you can't or don't want to, that's okay. I'm sure the package maintainer
> will look into that.

Well, I'm not an Arch user typically; I just installed it into a VM (actually, 
my first ever Arch install) to check out whether snap packages I've created 
would work.

I can try to take a look, but I'm not sure I'll get there before the maintainer 
does ;-)

More information about the Snapcraft mailing list