Missing environment variables

Sergio Schvezov sergio.schvezov at canonical.com
Sun Oct 23 20:30:28 UTC 2016

El 22/10/16 a las 11:11, Gustavo Niemeyer escribió:
> If there's a recommendation, I'd suggest recommending the last known 
> stable, as the pace has been so fast that there are significant 
> benefits of running a more recent version.
> We also have a mechanism snaps can use to declare the dependency on 
> certain aspects of snapd, but unfortunately the common dir had a 
> couple of issues until it finally worked smoothly.
> We should really support a more explicit:
>     assumes: [snapd2.15]
> and leave the individual feature flags for aspects that can indeed 
> vary across environments.

In my other email I sort of came to the conclusion of using assumes :-)
I did not know about snapd2.15. where can we see the full list of keywords?

More information about the Snapcraft mailing list