Ports,ports,ports..

[Victor Palau]

+1

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Leo Arias <leo.arias at canonical.com> wrote:

> Nice!
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Victor Palau <victor.palau at canonical.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Overall, seems like it would be good practice that if a snap publishes a
>> service to a port, that:
>>
>>    - the port can be easily changed
>>    - the snap can be updated told that it will be proxy-ed, and work well
>>
>> I would add this one: To easily print which port is being used
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/snappy/+bug/1608572.
> Ideally for me, when the service is installed it should print the URL to
> access it.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snapcraft/attachments/20161010/8ad1beee/attachment.html>