confinement failure when uploading to store

[Jamie Strandboge]

On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 10:41 -0300, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> I think it makes sense in general, actually.  The kernel is special because
> the image itself is of course not confined, but if/when we introduce hooks
> for example, we'll want these to be properly confined, declaring any
> interfaces they require to run explicitly as usual for everything else.
> Same idea for the gadget snap.
> 
> That being the case, having development mode for them also makes sense.
> 

Ok, I'll update the tools accordingly.

-- 
Jamie Strandboge             | http://www.canonical.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snapcraft/attachments/20160613/3ed9d7d1/attachment.sig>