Overriding seccomp policy: shm_open

Jamie Strandboge jamie at canonical.com
Thu Aug 4 13:27:46 UTC 2016

On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 11:21 +1000, Jacob Zimmermann wrote:
>> 2) Assuming that it was necessary to patch hatari like Jamie suggested,
> what is the idiomatic way to apply a patch to upstream sources before
> compiling?

Once this bug is implemented, patching for something like shm_open() would not
be necessary and it simply becomes a matter of packaging:

Jamie Strandboge             | http://www.canonical.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snapcraft/attachments/20160804/0b59807e/attachment.sig>

More information about the Snapcraft mailing list