Dear friends,<br><br>We have a strong feeling that this will lead us to no where. This is a very important issue for us. <br> <br>Our arguments are not taken in any consideration. The potential future of Kurdish <br>standardization should not depend on an article of Wikipedia or a code suggested by a group of men
<br>calling themselves Kurdish Academy.<br>We at Kurditgroup consider the implementation of CKB as<br> a very seriouse matter and it endangoures the future of standardization.<br><br>Kurditgroup will not support this baseless ckb. Please let more Kurds descide themselves on this issue.
<br><br>glad to have an opinion,<br>Bard<br><a href="http://Kurditgroup.org">Kurditgroup.org</a><br><br><br><br> <br><br>Hi,<br><br>> Language (Geographical Location/country)<br>> In case of Kurdish; Kurdish(Turkey/Iran/Iraq/Syria).
<br>> However such a geographical indication is emotionally and politically loaded<br>> so we can avoid it by using the locally used terms:<br>> Kurdish (North) ku_no<br>> Kurdish (West) ku_we<br>> Kurdish (South) ku_so
<br>> Kurdish (East) ku_ea<br><br>Probably you are right and it's all about politics, but due to fact<br>that this language has officialy registered code we should use it.<br>It's SIL who assign codes to language not Ubuntu users.
<br><br><a href="http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/">http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/</a><br><br>> From my point of view the three-letter iso639-3 code represents nothing in<br>> case of Kurdish.<br><br>Maybe, but my point is, that using iso codes we don't need to resolve
<br>any political or language related problems.<br><br>> Please be aware of the fact that there is no language or<br>> sub-language called Central Kurdish.<br><br>according to SIL, Wikipedia and Kurdish Academy there is such language :-)
<br><br>best regards,<br>Michal<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/25/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Michal Ostrowski</b> <<a href="mailto:ostrowski.michal@gmail.com">ostrowski.michal@gmail.com</a>> wrote:
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin-top: 0; margin-right: 0; margin-bottom: 0; margin-left: 0; margin-left: 0.80ex; border-left-color: #cccccc; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex">
Hi<br><br>2007/1/25, bardaqani bardaqani <<a href="mailto:bardaqani@kurditgroup.org">bardaqani@kurditgroup.org</a>>:<br>> Dear Erdal / Dear friends,<br>><br>> (ckb (Sorani) are the same as for ku, nplural =2, plurals !=1. ) is unclear.
<br>> Sorry for being late to the discussion about CKB .<br>> There is no such a thing like central Kurdish, even though its existence in<br>> :<br>> <a href="http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=ckb">
http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=ckb</a><br>><br><br>In my opinion if there is an official three-letter iso639-3 code, then<br>there is simply no need to use other codes for such language.<br><br>Michal
<br></blockquote></div><br>