motu-release will revert libgems-ruby to the old state.

[Scott Kitterman]

On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:59:57 +1000 Sarah Hobbs <hobbsee at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
>> On Wednesday 03 September 2008 10:30:09 Soren Hansen wrote:
>>> Under what authority? The members of motu-release were elected to be
>>> part of the team that evaluates and approves/disapproves various freeze
>>> exceptions. Nothing else.
>> 
>> This is your opinion. However, the charter of the motu-release team has 
been 
>> extensively discussed at a motu meeting [1][2], and then in the ubuntu 
motu 
>> mailing list [3].
>> If anything, the team description in the wiki, which you use as a basis 
for 
>> your interpretation, is obsolete. I guess that was the description for 
the 
>> old motu-uvf team and I urge the team owner to take actions in this 
respect.
>> 
>> Cesare
>> 
>> [1]https://wiki.kubuntu.org/MOTU/Meetings/2008-02-01
>> [2]http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/02/01/%23ubuntu-meeting.html
>> [3]https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2008-February/003191.html
>> 
>
>Which, by my discussions with Daniel, and the general perception that 
>seems to be going around, means that they *do* in fact have the 
>authority, and that your argument is therefore null and void.
>
>I've asked Daniel to publicly clarify the official position, which will 
>hopefully clear up any possibly future confusion.
>
>Hobbsee

I think you meant this as a reply to Soren, not Cesare?

I think authority is a matter for MOTU, not specifically Daniel, where 
there is doubt.

Scott K