motu-release will revert libgems-ruby to the old state.

[Soren Hansen]

On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 10:42:01AM +0200, Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
>> Under what authority? The members of motu-release were elected to be
>> part of the team that evaluates and approves/disapproves various
>> freeze exceptions. Nothing else.
> This is your opinion. However, the charter of the motu-release team
> has been extensively discussed at a motu meeting [1][2],

Around 30 lines of IRC discussing the renaming from motu-uvf to
motu-release, of which less than 10 deals with the change in objectives,
is hardly "extensive". Additionally, the vote at the end of the
discussion *only* dealt with the renaming.

> and then in the ubuntu motu mailing list [3]. 

AFAICT (please correct me if I'm missing something) the only "outcome"
of that discussion was that we should discuss this some more.

> If anything, the team description in the wiki, which you use as a
> basis for your interpretation, is obsolete.

I *wish* there was a more up-to-date description somewhere. Lack of a
description does not grant authority. At least not where I'm from.

> I guess that was the description for the old motu-uvf team and I urge
> the team owner to take actions in this respect.

And *I* would like to urge them to not do anything until this had been
discussed and agreed upon.

-- 
Soren Hansen               | 
Virtualisation specialist  | Ubuntu Server Team
Canonical Ltd.             | http://www.ubuntu.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/motu-council/attachments/20080903/e39da951/attachment.pgp