motu-release will revert libgems-ruby to the old state.

[Sarah Hobbs]

Soren Hansen wrote:
> Under what authority? The members of motu-release were elected to be
> part of the team that evaluates and approves/disapproves various freeze
> exceptions. Nothing else.

To say nothing else...

If this were the case, then why was the team ever renamed as motu 
release?  Surely they should still be motu-ffe or something.  Why would 
the MOTU allow the name change, if the activities did not change also, 
to mirror what ubuntu-release does in main?

By nature, the entire point of a release team is that it keeps the 
domain in a releasable state, which can be different at various points 
of the release cycle, and acts, in various ways, to ensure that this 
original aim is kept.

Obviously, having some documentation on how they do this might be nice, 
though.

Hobbsee

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/motu-council/attachments/20080903/d1cf30d2/attachment.pgp