Considering component-specific work when reviewing applications

[Soren Hansen]

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 05:21:21PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Well then I guess I'm left feeling like this is the unwritten "Server
> Team need not apply" rule.
> 
> When I've brought this up about people who were active in #ubuntu-desktop, 
> but not #ubuntu-motu my concerns were dismissed.
> 
> I feel like it's a clear double standard.

I agree[1]. 

To Emmet: I think it's interesting that this thread started when you
retracted your +1 on Dustin's application referencing that "it would set
a new precedent". Well, by doing so, you've helped establish a
different, new precedent, namely that if you're a server team person,
you get to be dragged through the mud for weeks for no apparant, good
reason, and you don't get to play until you're core-dev.

[1]: Yes, you heard it here first. ScottK and I agree.

-- 
Soren Hansen               | 
Virtualisation specialist  | Ubuntu Server Team
Canonical Ltd.             | http://www.ubuntu.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/motu-council/attachments/20080820/a0c866f7/attachment.pgp