Core-Dev Application: Till Kamppeter

[Soren Hansen]

On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 04:31:33PM +0200, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> >> he's done lots of good work, and this looks like a one-off.
> > Well, so has Till. And he was even told by pitti that it was ok. I'm
> > finding it difficult to hold that against him. Additionally, if he
> > didn't intend to work on fixing it straight away, I'm sure we
> > wouldn't have uploaded it in the first place.
> That's not correct...

What's not correct? 

a) That Till has done lots of good work? 
b) That he was told by pitti it was ok? 
c) That Till wouldn't have uploaded it if he didn't intend to fix it
straigt away?

> If it would be someone else, a motu hopeful or e.g. just me...I think
> I would already be on a  stake :)

Why?

> The fun part is, that you have to deal with critics..and the critic of
> stefan is correct at this point.  I trust pitti and till in many
> ways...but if we don't follow our QA rules...we are doomed in the
> future...and if pitti acked this package because he trusted Till, and
> without reviewing it properly,  so pitti is getting also a LPS, bad
> pitti...

What's an LPS?

-- 
Soren Hansen               | 
Virtualisation specialist  | Ubuntu Server Team
Canonical Ltd.             | http://www.ubuntu.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/motu-council/attachments/20080402/c954c4a0/attachment-0001.pgp