ubuntu at kitterman.com
Thu Sep 27 17:33:11 BST 2007
On Thursday 27 September 2007 09:19, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:30:10 -0400
> Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at kitterman.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:24:42 +0200 Laurent Bigonville
> > <l.bigonville at edpnet.be> wrote:
> > >I think bzr (or other VCS) is only an help to maintaining stuff. Using
> > >(deb)diff is always possible but it's not so easy..
> > So how do you keep it straight when one MOTU makes an upload based on the
> > source in the archive and another pulls from the VCS? I see having more
> > than one 'official' source as a real problem.
> I was talking about the differences in the reviewing process between
> bzr, debdiff and revu. Of course if you do collaborative maintaining
> you must use a single source.
So if some people use the VCS, how do you do that without making it mandatory
More information about the Motu-council