Lack of ~motu expiry dates

[Daniel Holbach]

Am Sonntag, den 11.11.2007, 17:05 +0100 schrieb Soren Hansen:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 03:43:19PM +1100, William Grant wrote:
> > During a discussion in #ubuntu-motu today, it was noted that none of
> > the new (ie. post ~ubuntu-dev -> ~motu move) MOTU have expiry dates
> > set.  This is probably a bad thing, as we should really be operating
> > on the principle of least privilege, and having a lot of inactive
> > members skews the totals - we don't have 100 active developers. It may
> > be a simple oversight, in that ~ubuntu-dev had a default expiry period
> > set, while ~motu doesn't.
> > 
> > The possibility of reducing the default membership period (previously 2
> > years) was also raised, so might be good to discuss.
> 
> Having motu memebership expire seems sensible. Depending on the
> bureaucracy involved in renewing the membership, it might also make
> sense to lower the default membership period to perhaps one year.
> 
> What has been the process for renewal of membership of ubuntu-dev?
> Reapproval by TB or could you do yourself?

I'm not sure myself.

CCing Technical Board.

Have a nice day,
 Daniel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/motu-council/attachments/20071112/3174c829/attachment.pgp