<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/12/16 14:29, Alan Griffiths
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:549fa491-89b1-50e6-2113-909b6d47b75e@canonical.com"
type="cite">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/12/16 13:18, Kevin DuBois
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAO_R1ApmcmpY=k2+eQ6wMzEv6NLXNyM4kaAwvpG10h7qO+d5mQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
MirRenderSurface I hope will get a shorter name that closer to
a one word noun. Although the ideal of making it MirSurface
after the existing MirSurface becomes MirWindow is quite
ambitious.
<div class="gmail-HOEnZb">
<div class="gmail-h5"><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Agree. I think it needs to be done before 1.0, and would be
nice to do before making the header public.</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Are we really intending to rework all the code "out there" that
refers to MirSurface?!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think we should instead to something like: Add MrSurface and
MrWindow.</p>
<p>And for backwards compatibility:<br>
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>typedef MirSurface MrWindow;<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>