<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 31/08/15 04:25, Daniel van Vugt wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:55E3C93D.50307@canonical.com" type="cite">I think there's another reason to not use the plural "symbols" in the stanza name as has been suggested. Because we're actually talking about the end result of how individual symbols are named: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:some_new_function@@MIR_PLATFORM_9.2">some_new_function@@MIR_PLATFORM_9.2</a> <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:some_new_function@MIR_PLATFORM_9.1">some_new_function@MIR_PLATFORM_9.1</a> # Slightly less new So ideally each one should not be named "*symbols*". Even using the word "symbol" is redundant. We're just adding version suffixes really, so keep that in mind. </blockquote> OK, how about: MIR_PLATFORM_9v0.16.0 </body> </html>