<div dir="ltr">Hi, <br><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Alexandros Frantzis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alexandros.frantzis@canonical.com" target="_blank">alexandros.frantzis@canonical.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
So, what I would like to hear from you is:<br>
<br>
1. Your general preference for python vs C++ for the test scripts<br>
2. Any particular performance tests that you would like to see implemented,<br>
  so we can get a first idea of what kinds of custom behaviors we may need<br>
3. Any other comments, of course!<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">So far I mostly used C++ to evaluate lttng results. I didnt felt slowed down especially boost<br>accumulators made it very easy to produce statistical information. For actual test execution<br>I used shell - but provided the necessary user input manually.<br><br>...So yes we need something to better share test scenarios.<br></div></div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote"></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div>To better understand system behaviour it would be good to visualise the activities of<br>the processes. And especially not only libmir* itself. So I was looking for a common way<br>to produce time spans of activities, or in other words pairs of lttng traces points that can be<br>easily matched. But the bigger problem is getting a usable for visualisation. The now <br>renamed Trace Compass tools are just far too slow to even cope with a few seconds of data.<br>..<br><br></div><div>regards<br></div><div>Andreas<br></div></div></div></div></div>