<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 19/11/13 14:18, Alan Griffiths
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:528B7338.7090003@canonical.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">I think the natural domain name is
"scene".<br>
<br>
It was the first suggestion and was only doubted because we've
it misinterpreted as implying that it /is a/ scenegraph (rather
than /has a/ scenegraph).<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
we've *seen* it misinterpreted<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:528B7338.7090003@canonical.com" type="cite">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"> <br>
In the absence of a clearer, natural name I think we should go
with "scene" and educate people that think it is synonymous with
"scenegraph".<br>
<br>
On 19/11/13 01:38, Kevin DuBois wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAO_R1ArX9GAk9YsMVT4pM-TTAy_hiGYXqVT=59LaLKcOf6ZYbA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:courier
new,monospace">I'm also slightly against 'core', just
because people will think its more important than it is<br>
<br>
scene, model, and model_controller has connotations to me,
maybe mir::diaroma?<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:courier
new,monospace">Pretty unloaded word... To me, it means 3d
objects put in a box for the purposes of displaying. If no
one supports that though, 'scene' would be my preference.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:courier
new,monospace"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:courier
new,monospace">Cheers,<br>
Kevin<br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:32 AM,
Alexandros Frantzis <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:alexandros.frantzis@canonical.com"
target="_blank">alexandros.frantzis@canonical.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:27:31AM +0000,
Alan Griffiths wrote:<br>
> This came up again with my resent proposal to move
Session related state<br>
> to the "surfaces" component.<br>
><br>
> On 25/10/13 15:22, Kevin Gunn wrote:<br>
> > I'm ok with "state & implementation code"
changing from "surface" to<br>
> > "core". I'm sure others will weigh in.<br>
><br>
> I'm not convinced that it says "semantic data
model" but neither does<br>
> "surfaces". But what do folks think about "core"?<br>
><br>
> Strongly For/Weakly For/Weakly Against/Strongly
Against?<br>
<br>
</div>
I think the term "core" is at the same time too vague and
too strong.<br>
It's too vague because it doesn't describe what the "core"
component of<br>
mir contains. It's too strong because "core" forces us to
think in terms<br>
of a special core component and other non-core components,
which I don't<br>
think is appropriate for our architecture.<br>
<br>
My vote is on the stronger verge of "Weakly Against"; I am
sure we could<br>
get used to it, but I think we can do better. Some
alternatives<br>
mentioned on IRC:<br>
<br>
mir::scene<br>
mir:model<br>
mir::model_controller<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Alexandros<br>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
Mir-devel mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Mir-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">Mir-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/mir-devel"
target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/mir-devel</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>