<div dir="ltr">thanks for the feedback.<div>it likely won't be something to be fixed in a short term - but i agree, bugs (over blueprints) seem closer to being 'everything' you'd want when looking at the vices & virtues of bugs vs blueprints.</div>
<div>i think what bugs are missing is a bit of aggregation & reporting ...as well as a way to better reflect scheduling (for a big picture view)</div><div><br></div><div>in the near term - there is certainly nothing wrong with pre-pending to the bug title...i would suggest "[ER]" for 'enhancement request'...</div>
<div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Daniel van Vugt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:daniel.van.vugt@canonical.com" target="_blank">daniel.van.vugt@canonical.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Though I recall some of the proprietary issue tracking systems I've used in the past clearly distinguished between Bug and Enhancement.<br>
<br>
And that in itself was sometimes problematic. Where people can't decide or agree if something is a bug or a feature, you either need a third classification or a more neutral system that just doesn't care (like Launchpad).<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 16/10/13 09:28, Daniel van Vugt wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I think we all agree Launchpad does not represent enhancement/feature<br>
requests ideally. That's why I asked how we'd like to work around the<br>
shortcomings.<br>
<br>
Also, I just found the bug (which itself is actually a feature request)<br>
and it looks unlikely to be resolved:<br>
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/176431" target="_blank">https://bugs.launchpad.net/<u></u>launchpad/+bug/176431</a><br>
<br>
<br>
On 15/10/13 22:09, MichaĆ Sawicz wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On 15.10.2013 16:04, Daniel d'Andrada wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Bugs and new features are, on a slighly higher level, the same thing:<br>
work that has to be done on some piece of software, according to some<br>
specs, with a target milestone, an assignee, a given priority, a state<br>
(in progress, new, commited, released), a discussion around it, etc.<br>
<br>
At my previous job we had different systems for those (bugs and<br>
features) for a long time and it was awesome when we finally started<br>
using only one (the bug tracker, but tweaked a bit to better accommodate<br>
those two kinds of tasks) for everything. I think it's just natural to<br>
do so.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I believe the biggest problem with launchpad in that regard is that<br>
"Wishlist" is the lowest priority (Importance) level. You can't make an<br>
enhancement higher priority than a bug, that's why some clear<br>
distinguishing between a bug and a feature would be nice indeed.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
-- <br>
Mir-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Mir-devel@lists.ubuntu.com" target="_blank">Mir-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/mir-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/mir-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>