Mir Version 1, stable ABIs and licences

[Daniel van Vugt]

My personal view is that we should drop this discussion.

We have been mindful of reducing ABI breaks for years but that gets 
trumped by the need to implement missing features etc.

Mir code landings have been extremely active recently, with thousands of 
lines changing every day or so. And to me that's the opposite of what 
would be happening near a maturation milestone.

I think we should let maturation happen organically. When the changes 
slow down and when we actually haven't broken ABIs for a while, that 
would be the right time to have this discussion.

- Daniel


On 07/10/16 23:24, Alan Griffiths wrote:
> On 04/10/16 09:03, Daniel van Vugt wrote:
>> This email thread is a mess. Please enable comments in the doc.
>>
>> Also I suggest making this a public discussion (CC'd).
>>
> Done.
>
>