Should this be "core"?

[Christopher James Halse Rogers]

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Alan Griffiths 
<alan.griffiths at canonical.com> wrote:
> On 05/10/15 12:12, Alexandros Frantzis wrote:
>>  but we should ensure
>>  our built-in cursor images support all the predefined cursor types. 
>> In
>>  our client API we are exposing a set of predefined cursor names, 
>> which
>>  the BuiltinCursorImage implementation doesn't currently support.
> 
> To clarify, BuiltinCursorImage does support retrieving a cursor image
> for the predefined cursor names. It is just that it always returns one
> based on "black_arrow".
> 
> Is that good enough default behaviour?

Not really.

I think we should do one of two things:
1) Remove that cursor-names interface entirely and just rely on getting 
a BufferStream for the cursor, or,
2) If the *shell* wants to use the named-cursor support (I don't 
believe it does?) then we should install an xcursor theme on the phone 
and remove BuiltinCursorImage.