Packages don't cooperate

[Cemil Azizoglu]

The platform interface is not much different from mir server and client ABI
in terms of backward/forward compatibility. So it should probably get
versioned like the ABI # for server/client (ie. option 2) since that is
what we are used to doing already. It takes a bit of careful care, though.
But I think it's less error-prone.


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Alberto Aguirre <
alberto.aguirre at canonical.com> wrote:

> (1) seems sensible after the api stabilizes a bit. Otherwise, wouldn't be
> just increasing the required bin version of the platform anyway right?
>
> I've been hit by using the wrong platform lib version (my own fault) but I
> would have caught it earlier by either Chris' approach or approach (2) in
> the bug description.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Daniel van Vugt <vanvugt at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have a preference on which direction to go with:
>>    https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1293944
>> ?
>>
>> I can imagine either solution proposed in the bug should work. Maybe
>> someone can think of a third option?
>>
>> Regardless of the solution though it will take multiple releases to see
>> the benefit of a fix.
>>
>> - Daniel
>>
>> --
>> Mir-devel mailing list
>> Mir-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
>> mailman/listinfo/mir-devel
>>
>
>
> --
> Mir-devel mailing list
> Mir-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/mir-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/mir-devel/attachments/20140501/6f52d401/attachment.html>