Enhancements as opposed to bugs

Alan Griffiths alan.griffiths at canonical.com
Tue Oct 15 14:55:24 UTC 2013


On 15/10/13 14:01, Kevin Gunn wrote:
> Something that I have not pushed very hard but is something I prefer
> is to place features in relevant blueprints and keep bugs as bugs.

In managing the backlog bugs vs features isn't the most useful
distinction and is given far too much prominance in launchpad. They are
both sources of work and either could be planned/reactive,
urgent/non-urgent, important/unimportant, approved/unapproved.

I prefer to have everything in one place - but launchpad isn't great at
managing the many dimensions of work either as bugs or as blueprints.



More information about the Mir-devel mailing list