alan.griffiths at canonical.com
Mon Nov 18 10:27:31 UTC 2013
This came up again with my resent proposal to move Session related state
to the "surfaces" component.
On 25/10/13 15:22, Kevin Gunn wrote:
> I'm ok with "state & implementation code" changing from "surface" to
> "core". I'm sure others will weigh in.
I'm not convinced that it says "semantic data model" but neither does
"surfaces". But what do folks think about "core"?
Strongly For/Weakly For/Weakly Against/Strongly Against?
More information about the Mir-devel