A new FTBFS every day
Daniel van Vugt
daniel.van.vugt at canonical.com
Wed Jun 26 02:50:20 UTC 2013
I doubt people would object to increased automation, unless we start
needing language features missing in gcc-4.7.
On 26/06/13 10:49, Thomi Richards wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Daniel van Vugt
> <daniel.van.vugt at canonical.com <mailto:daniel.van.vugt at canonical.com>>
> Can we add raring CI support back in so these build problems get
> caught in time?
> I believe that's a question for me, and the answer is "yes, we can".
> Unless there are any objections, I'll add raring as a CI platform
> tomorrow (thereby giving the list 12 hours to object).
> Thomi Richards
> thomi.richards at canonical.com <mailto:thomi.richards at canonical.com>
More information about the Mir-devel