A new FTBFS every day

[Daniel van Vugt]

I doubt people would object to increased automation, unless we start 
needing language features missing in gcc-4.7.


On 26/06/13 10:49, Thomi Richards wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Daniel van Vugt
> <daniel.van.vugt at canonical.com <mailto:daniel.van.vugt at canonical.com>>
> wrote:
>
>
>     Can we add raring CI support back in so these build problems get
>     caught in time?
>
>
> I believe that's a question for me, and the answer is "yes, we can".
> Unless there are any objections, I'll add raring as a CI platform
> tomorrow (thereby giving the list 12 hours to object).
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> --
> Thomi Richards
> thomi.richards at canonical.com <mailto:thomi.richards at canonical.com>