alan.griffiths at canonical.com
Fri Jun 7 11:18:07 UTC 2013
On 07/06/13 09:26, Alan Griffiths wrote:
> I'll look into this. (Is there a bug registered?)
> On 07/06/13 04:20, Thomi Richards wrote:
>> The mir_stress binary is now built as part of the regular trunk build
>> process. However, the client API seems to be leaking FDs again.
>> My plan is to make the stress tests run as part of every merge
>> proposal, which will make regressions such as this impossible to land
>> in the future. However, there's a bit of infrastructure we need to
>> wrangle until that can happen, and I'm on holiday for the next few weeks.
>> It would be great if someone familiar with the client API could run
>> the mir-stress tests (run "mir_stress -n 10"), fix the FD leak, and
>> possibly keep an eye on the situation until we manage to get this
>> Thomi Richards
>> thomi.richards at canonical.com <mailto:thomi.richards at canonical.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mir-devel