The case for a "SceneGraph"

[Michał Sawicz]

W dniu 19.07.2013 12:02, Daniel van Vugt pisze:
> Yes indeed the shell is meant to implement the scene graph. But that
> implementation is still inside libmirserver. It needs to be pulled out
> of the server library.
> 
> Interface:       mir::compositor::Scene
> Implementation:  mir::surfaces::SurfaceStack
> 
> That implementation should go in the shell, whenever feasible. Though
> there is a reasonable argument for keeping a nice fallback SurfaceStack
> implementation in libmirserver for simple shells.

Is what you're saying that it *is* planned to be possible to access
out-of-process surfaces in the shell's (Qt/QML for unity8) scenegraph?

-- 
Michał (Saviq) Sawicz <michal.sawicz at canonical.com>
Canonical Services Ltd.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 899 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/mir-devel/attachments/20130719/ddd0ff68/attachment-0001.pgp>