Request for feedback: how slow is your slowest MAAS cloud?
Dustin Kirkland
kirkland at canonical.com
Fri Jun 2 01:28:18 UTC 2017
For a while, I ran my MAAS controllers on a rpi2.
Eventually, I abandoned that architecture, once I switched to MAAS HA,
and tried to instantiate a second MAAS server in a LXD container on an
x86_64 server. As it turns out, Postgres does not cluster very well
across 32-bit armv7l and x86_64.
But, as a single, standalone non-HA MAAS, it ran well enough on a rpi2.
Benchmarking those 1,000,00 hashes takes about 7 seconds there.
ubuntu at aurora2:~⟫ time echo key | nettle-pbkdf2 -i 1000000 salt
6abeaeaece1ad299 b3a894cd434ca4e7
real 0m6.998s
user 0m6.992s
sys 0m0.000s
ubuntu at aurora2:~⟫ time echo key | nettle-pbkdf2 -i 1000000 salt
6abeaeaece1ad299 b3a894cd434ca4e7
real 0m7.039s
user 0m7.028s
sys 0m0.008s
ubuntu at aurora2:~⟫ time echo key | nettle-pbkdf2 -i 1000000 salt
6abeaeaece1ad299 b3a894cd434ca4e7
real 0m6.994s
user 0m6.940s
sys 0m0.056s
All of the rest of my x86_64 systems (i3, i5, i7, Xeon) take less than
1 second, for the record.
Dustin Kirkland
Ubuntu Product & Strategy
Canonical, Ltd.
@dustinkirkland
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Mike Pontillo
<mike.pontillo at canonical.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Mike Pontillo <mike.pontillo at canonical.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Derivation time: x.xx seconds
>> Architecture:
>> Model name:
>
>
> Ah, sorry, I forgot to add:
>
> Machine purpose: <MAAS region | MAAS rack | deployed machine>
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
> --
> Maas-devel mailing list
> Maas-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/maas-devel
>
More information about the Maas-devel
mailing list