[Maas-devel] Integrated your code into lp:~trapnine/maas/ha_rack_details

[Carla Berkers]

Yes, it is looking really good!

Agreed we should keep the zone. The following layout in this order matches
what we agreed (and is consistent with node details):

on the left:
- Type
- Last image sync
- Zone
- Fabrics
- DHCP

and on the right:
- CPU
- RAM
- Storage
- OS
- MAAS version

The build should match this layout. Jeff there are no updated designs, at
this point we are editing in code to save time.

I've been thinking about MAAS version. If it is the same as the region
version it is not useful info for the user - in fact it might be
unnecessarily confusing.
If the controller version is different from the region version we should
display an error.
So I think we should remove it from the summary and make sure we have an
error message in place - what do you think Blake?

Thanks,
Carla


On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Blake Rouse <blake.rouse at canonical.com>
wrote:

> I think Jeff is correct in keeping the zone. Zone is a physical zone and a
> rack controller must exists in that physical zone. But overall it is
> looking really good.
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Richard McCartney <
> richard.mccartney at canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Jeff,
>>
>> I’ve pulled down your working branch for MAAS HA, you need to run make
>> styles as your not using the new updated styles at all and it should fix
>> the issue with the tree & table styles. Regarding the information summary
>> this has been finalised in our design catchups and should look like the
>> following screenshot I have attached. Apart from that everything else so
>> far looks correct in your working branch.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> *Richard McCartney*
>> Front End Web Developer
>> Cloud & Web Team
>>
>> ubuntu.com | canonical.com
>>
>> richard.mccartney at canonical.com
>> +44 (0) 792 183 4505
>>
>> On 16 Feb 2016, at 03:08, Jeff Jones <jeff.jones at canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rich,
>>
>> I've attached a shot of a working first rev of the controller details
>> page.
>> This includes all your code from  lp:~ricgard/maas/rack-details.
>>
>> Questions:
>>
>> 1) Some of the summary items in your HTML differ from the node details
>> page and Carla's mock. (no zone, OS, status on left, DHCP on right,
>> etc) I've moved them around a bit to make them more consistent with
>> both. Thoughts?
>>
>> 2) Does the tree look right to you? I integrated all your CSS changes,
>> etc, and that part of the HTML is rote from your branch. You can look
>> at the HTML in my branch at lp:~trapnine/maas/ha_rack_details  - feel
>> free to submit any HTML changes there.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jeff
>>
>> P.S. Has the original sketch from Carla been updated?
>> (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxXAS-9xXKkLZHhWMEJ6OE55NHc/view)
>> <controller_details.png>
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 

*Carla Berkers*
Lead UX Designer
Cloud & Web Teams
+44 7926121959
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/maas-devel/attachments/20160216/0c211873/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen Shot 2016-02-16 at 10.22.08.png
Type: image/png
Size: 502100 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/maas-devel/attachments/20160216/0c211873/attachment.png>