[Maas-devel] Replacing Apache

[Mark Shuttleworth]

On 27/11/14 16:00, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> Could that be provided as a legacy option? In other words, new
> installs would run Apache-less on port 80/443, but old installs would
> leave Apache in-place with a proxy entry. 

I think taking port 80/443 is unfriendly. People EXPECT those ports to
be apache, nginx or haproxy, maybe also squid, not some app server.

Socially, I think it's better to put MAAS on it's own above-1024 port,
with a trivial-to-enable proxy from the above to /MAAS/.

Mark

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/maas-devel/attachments/20141127/c908ac3c/attachment.pgp>