[Maas-devel] Kanban board changes for QA

[Julian Edwards]

On Monday 08 October 2012 15:49:39 Francis J. Lacoste wrote:
> On 12-10-07 11:27 PM, Julian Edwards wrote:
> > On Monday 08 October 2012 09:11:06 Jeroen Vermeulen wrote:
> >> On 2012-10-05 22:42, Diogo Matsubara wrote:
> >>> I had a meeting with Francis and we agreed to a small process change
> >>> for MAAS QA. Once you fix a bug found during QA (those in the QA-found
> >>> lane) don't move them to the QA lane. The QA lane should be for
> >>> feature cards and corner cases. Moving all of individual bug cards to
> >>> the QA lane makes the lane crowded and I simply won't have the time to
> >>> QA every bug fix done. The priority for me should be in testing the
> >>> features as whole not individual bug fixes.
> >> 
> >> If not to the next lane, where should they go after landing?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Jeroen
> > 
> > I added a Done lane.
> 
> My answer there would have been the Done-Done lane, like it was before.
> How is that Done lane different than the Done-done lane?

I thought that we were only putting feature cards in the done-done lane 
though?  I've replicated what we used to have where tasks/bugs go in the 
'done' lane (and get archived from there) and when all the tasks/bugs are 
finished we move the green feature card to QA and then done-done.

Happy to be corrected if my understanding is wrong :)

> Also, don't forget to unblock the green cards once you've fixed the
> blocking bugs, so that Diogo can re-attempt the validation of the story.

Yep.  They were all still genuinely blocked when I EODed yesterday, so I hope 
people did unblock appropriately.

Cheers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/maas-devel/attachments/20121009/bd3b379b/attachment.pgp>