[Maas-devel] Kanban board changes for QA

[Francis J. Lacoste]

On 12-10-07 09:45 PM, Julian Edwards wrote:
> On Friday 05 October 2012 12:42:41 Diogo Matsubara wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > 
>> > I had a meeting with Francis and we agreed to a small process change
>> > for MAAS QA. Once you fix a bug found during QA (those in the QA-found
>> > lane) don't move them to the QA lane. The QA lane should be for
>> > feature cards and corner cases. Moving all of individual bug cards to
>> > the QA lane makes the lane crowded and I simply won't have the time to
>> > QA every bug fix done. The priority for me should be in testing the
>> > features as whole not individual bug fixes.
>> > 
>> > Cheers,
> How will you know which critical problems to re-check?  Are you working from a 
> script each time?

He is. So in theory, if he encountered the bug initially, he shouldn't
encounter it when he attempts to validate the story once the blockers
are found. Otherwise, he'll simply file new bugs.



-- 
Francis J. Lacoste
francis.lacoste at canonical.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 259 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/maas-devel/attachments/20121008/a9c8f586/attachment.pgp>