I like the idea of being consistent with the rest of the Ubuntu family. Does the standard encrypted LVM in ubiquity and Debian-installer (server) work for us without any changes? If so, give me the numbers and I'll set them up for us. No changes needed then! @wxl Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader <div class="gmail_quote">On Mar 4, 2015 8:25 AM, "Nio Wiklund" <<a href="mailto:nio.wiklund@gmail.com">nio.wiklund@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Walter, Encrypted LVM is *the* test-case in all other Ubuntu flavours including Ubuntu server. I really think we should test it, not only LVM. 'Encrypted disk' is implemented via LVM. Lubuntu is a special case with 'encrypted LVM', and inside it 'encrypted home'. What I suggest is to remove 'encrypted home' from the test-case. Best regards Nio Den 2015-03-04 17:15, Walter Lapchynski skrev: > I agree there's no reason to wait for desktop to implement the change to > alternate. I do, however want to emphasize that encryption is more > valuable to the average user than LVM. Maybe we should separate these > testcases for now? Then at some point in the future, we could create a > combined one. Or is encrypted LVM a really unique case? > > @wxl > Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA > Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact > Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader > > On Mar 4, 2015 8:05 AM, "Nio Wiklund" <<a href="mailto:nio.wiklund@gmail.com">nio.wiklund@gmail.com</a> > <mailto:<a href="mailto:nio.wiklund@gmail.com">nio.wiklund@gmail.com</a>>> wrote: > > Den 2015-03-04 14:38, Lars Noodén skrev: > > On 04.03.2015 14:50, Nio Wiklund wrote: > >> Hi Walter, Lars, Phill and all other Lubuntu users > >> > >> I think we have a working alternative, that should be rather easy to > >> implement for the Alternate Install (Encryption) test-cases (for the > >> i386 as well as the amd64 iso files). > >> > >> @ Walter and Lars: Can we agree to modify the (alternate) test-cases? > >> > >> @ Lars: ... and when agreed, will you edit the alternate test-cases? > >> > >> @ Walter and Lars: The next step will be to design corresponding > >> test-cases for the Lubuntu desktop iso files. > > > > Hi, > > > > I can try modifying the Alternate encryption case, if someone can > remind > > me of the URL to the right guide to do that, when the time comes. The > > hard part is not the HTML but dealing with bazaar and then > following the > > right procedure for a pull. Would that be for 15.04 or for 15.10? > > > > > <a href="http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-testcase/ubuntu-manual-tests/trunk/files/head:/testcases/image/" target="_blank">http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-testcase/ubuntu-manual-tests/trunk/files/head:/testcases/image/</a> > <<a href="http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-testcase/ubuntu-manual-tests/trunk/files/head:/testcases/image/" target="_blank">http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-testcase/ubuntu-manual-tests/trunk/files/head:/testcases/image/</a>> > > > > For 16.04, it would be best if the installers handled encryption > > properly so that workarounds like dropping to the shell are not needed > > for full disk encryption. > > > >> ... > >> @ everybody: > >> > >> Skipping 'encrypted home inside encrypted disk with LVM' makes things > >> much easier to get working. ... > > > > Encrypted home is probably important if there are multiple users > or one > > user with multiple roles on the machine. For the full hard disk > > encryption I see a main use-case as being work laptops that travel and > > thus at risk of being lost or stolen. > > > > Regards, > > /Lars > > > > Hi Lars, > > 1. I hope we can agree very soon about the alternate encryption > test-cases, and do it for 15.04, but I can fully understand, that Walter > or some other important persons may want to wait and think twice before > changing these test-cases. > > 2. What I suggested today does not imply any dropping to a shell. > Without encrypted home the alternate test-cases will be smooth. But I'm > waiting for someone (you, Lars?) to verify my test results. > > 3. I agree that 'Encrypted home' is important if there are multiple > users or one user with multiple roles on the machine. But must it be > combined with encrypted disk and LVM? > > 4. I think creating the corresponding test-cases for the desktop > installer needs more time, but modifying the alternate test-cases need > not wait for the desktop ones to be ready for publishing. > > Best regards > Nio > </blockquote></div>