<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> During Lubuntu installation, when one chooses the option to install third-party software (including Flash and the Fluendo MP3 codec or player), presumably those are installed from the CD or from the Ubuntu repository, or have been vetted to work properly with Lubuntu. And on my second rig with hardware that met the Flash 11.2 minimum requirements, it did, as I wrote below. <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/8/2012 7:52 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:5022FBBC.4070905@cox.net" type="cite">Why didn't you install it from the Ubuntu repository? On 08/08/2012 04:46 PM, John Hupp wrote: <blockquote type="cite">OK, that's a proper distinction about Chromium not having integrated Flash. For my first LTSP server, the one about which I posted this, I installed Lubuntu with the Alternate Install CD (before I realized that it does not offer an F4 Modes: Install LTSP Server option, which was the reason I downloaded the Alternate Install) on less-powerful hardware. I just set up another one for testing and used the Desktop Install on more powerful hardware. I chose the installation option for third-party software (including Flash), and ***Flash works on YouTube*** without any further installations or updates. Unfortunately there were too many variables between the two installations to definitively pin down why Flash works on one setup and not the other. My successful setup has hardware that meets the minimum specs for Flash 11.2 (which I just discovered at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/release-note/release-notes-flash-player-11_20120305.html">http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/release-note/release-notes-flash-player-11_20120305.html</a>), and my unsuccessful setup falls short. That difference in specs is the likeliest explanation, though there is also the Alternate vs. Desktop install, and I can't remember if I chose the third-party software option on the unsuccessful rig. On 8/8/2012 1:49 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: <blockquote type="cite">On 08/08/2012 12:03 PM, John Hupp wrote: <blockquote type="cite">Hi, all. I installed Lubuntu 12.04, and I find that Chromium with integrated Flash -- the default right out of the box -- won't work at YouTube or Hulu. It generates a "Missing Plug-in" message. At Adobe's Find/Check-your-Flash-version page, Flash crashes. Yet Ubuntu 12.04 with the same default version of Chromium and Flash works OK. Anyone know what's going on and how to fix it? </blockquote> Chromium does *not*, in fact, have Flash integrated. <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromium_%28web_browser%29">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromium_%28web_browser%29</a> So, you'll have to install Flash yourself. </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </body> </html>