I'd propose Exaile instead of audacious (because it should deal with iPods; for me recently it does not anymore, so i installed Rhythmbox) For Macintosh (ppc) i think the totem browser plugin is a must have. May be, someone well skilled and experienced should do something like a small help file how to "play around" the missing flash problem - FlashVideoReplacer as keyword; and the missing html5 support in firefox as well. I'd put in midori too, which not only is extremely quick but supports nicely html5. Powerprefs as an interface to pbbuttonsd; gthumb for dealing with photos 2012/3/9 Stephen Smally <<a href="mailto:eco.stefi@fastwebnet.it">eco.stefi@fastwebnet.it</a>>: > On 03/09/2012 01:52 PM, Cyber Penguin wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Yorvyk <<a href="mailto:yorvik.ubunto@googlemail.com">yorvik.ubunto@googlemail.com</a>> > wrote: >> >> On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 07:15:13 -0400 >> Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset <<a href="mailto:jpxsat@gmail.com">jpxsat@gmail.com</a>> wrote: >> >> > > >> > > My suggestion when selecting apps for this list is that they run on a >> > > 300Mhz CPU with 128 MiB RAM >> > >> > Maybe a more suitable machine would be 500MHZ & 256MB Ram. Since all >> > modifications and restrictions to the kernel this two years, I'm in >> > doubt >> > that it's possible to install lubuntu (or any ubuntu flavour) on a >> > machine >> > with the specs you're pointing! (no more i586, PAE, drop of certain old >> > graphic cards...) / In the past I've installed Lubuntu 10.04 on very >> > old >> > machines with very poor Ram, but now that somethings are dropped the >> > system >> > simply does nothing :( >> > >> 400Mhz CPU 192 MiB RAM? >> >> > The questions are: >> > - a Pentium 1 or 2 can run Lubuntu 12.04 ? >> > - It's easy for a beginner to do that install or something more than the >> > usual has to be done? >> > >> > Correct me if I'm talking nonsense here, please! >> > >> Sort of :) >> All Pentium class CPUs are i686 compatible (with a very small number of >> exceptions). I have installed on a 128 MiB machine with a 200 Mhz PII using >> the alternate installer and run one app at a time. It was no more >> unpleasant than running Widows Vista on a 1.6Ghz Celeron and 1 GiB RAM (This >> not a joke!). The idea of setting the spec that low was to remind people >> what lightweight really means as some people think that anything less then a >> multi-core CPU is low spec. The app should ideally run OK using the basic >> VESA or fbdev video driver. >> >> >> > Though, I'm kinda loving you're idea Yorvyk!! Those apps could be >> > included >> > in LSC under "Lubuntu proposed" :) >> > >> Forgot to mention that bit. After a bit of testing and a vote, it would >> be nice to have a 'Lubuntu Recommended' section or stamp in the LSC. >> >> >> -- >> Yorvyk >> >> -- >> Lubuntu-users mailing list >> <a href="mailto:Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com">Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com</a> >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users</a> > > > Good idea, with the name changed. 'Lubuntu proposed' is too close to > 'precise-proposed' (in Software Sources). > > > > > No problem for this, we don't need a software source entry, we can just use > a file download by lsc. > example of lubuntu-proposed.list: > mplayer > audacious > abiword > > and so on. > > -- > Lubuntu-users mailing list > <a href="mailto:Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com">Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com</a> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users</a> >