<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Is not a big work since the apps which are intended to work with a
Desktop Environment has it in the Category (talking about
real-applications packages).<br>
Will add as whislist ;-)<br>
<br>
On 01/16/2012 09:45 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAD5cqVhH=jbD0MpBGkvvb0MHMO6C3nDb73K-s+Kkh-qR41eq3Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Stephen,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>that sounds an excellent idea. How big an 'ask' is it for
you investigate what is needed and what sort of time scale.
With your work on other areas of lubuntu does this fall into
"Wish-list" or something you are confident can be done
without pulling your limited and valuable time from other
projects?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Phill.
<div>
<div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 16 January 2012 20:35,
Stephen Smally <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:eco.stefi@fastwebnet.it"
target="_blank">eco.stefi@fastwebnet.it</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>On 01/16/2012 09:21 PM, Maps Backward wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0
0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
solid;padding-left:1ex">
LSC > USC (and Synaptic. too?) because it's
more lightweight. I can get behind that, but I
truly think that there should be at least an
option to only show Lubuntu-approved apps. If
what my friend tells me is true, Bodhi Software
Center focuses directly on their approved apps,
i.e. the ones consistent with their philosophy.
This seems to be relevant to the Lubuntu project
as a whole. Technically, there are already
Lubuntu-approved apps as is the case with the
default applications. There's no reason why the
community couldn't make similar decisions about
other apps, especially with all the different
things that we do. I suggest a flag for each
app, e.g. "Lubuntu-approved" and a checkbox or
something similar to toggle between searching
among apps with this flag only or not.<br>
<br>
wxl/walter<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
The main difference is that bodhi linux probably has
a separated repos + ubuntu repos. lubuntu hasn't its
own repo, so we can't do anything but make a list of
the approved apps or put a filter for GNOME/KDE
related packages (just an ads, something like "This
program is integrated with the GNOME/KDE desktop
environment, so it could require heavy dependencies"
<div>
<div><br>
<br>
-- <br>
Lubuntu-users mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com"
target="_blank">Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users"
target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">-- <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw" target="_blank">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw</a><br>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw"
target="_blank">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>